|
This document, written by Chris Carter, explores the relationship between Ozone ( O6 ) and ORMUS.
ORMUS and Ozone
Several years ago (in the late 1980s) I was working
with
an inventor who had developed a very efficient ozone generator. This
generator
was so efficient and produced such good ozone that we were able to get
it to clean up toxic mine drainage water to where it would meet state
drinking
water standards. This was the first and only ozone generator that the
Bureau
of Mines ever tested which could do this ( editors comment: The ozone generator in question used a high-energy plasma discharge on a long gas track fed with pure oxygen ).
.
At my prompting my inventor friend decided to clean
up
a mine waste pool in our area. His process worked quite well but he was
getting some strange "snotty" looking material in the treatment system.
If this snotty material was left to dry in the dark, it would become a
powder which would "fly" away if you tried to touch it. If it was dried
in sunlight, it would disappear in a flash of light as soon as it
became
dry.
An accident involving the mine clean up process put
my
friend off of further investigations into the snotty material.
In 1995 I heard a recorded lecture of David Hudson
talking
about his discovery of the ORMUS materials. In this lecture he told
about
how these materials would fly away if you put your hand near them and
they
would disappear in a flash of light if you left them to dry in the
sunlight.
I put two and two together and realized that Hudson's materials were
probably
the same as the materials that my friend had discovered.
Since 1995 we have been working with the ORMUS
materials
and ozone. We have found that these materials have an affinity for
oxygen
and water. David Hudson postulates that this affinity is due to a
common
resonance frequency between these materials. David Hudson in his
Portland
workshop said:
"This little zero point frequency I showed you
between
the positron and the electron; if you follow that right up the
electromagnetic
spectrum, it agrees with the molecular frequency of hydrogen dioxide,
or
water. So there is an affinity for this material and water. That's why
it is normally taken in water. When you come to understand that your
body
is, in fact, mainly water. That, literally, this material when you
distill
water it distills with the water as the oridide, the iridide, the
ruthidide,
just like chlorine. And so if you distill water thinking you are
getting
high purity water, it goes with the water. And it literally changes the
bond angles of the water. That one iridium atom controls 56 waters of
hydration
around itself. And all the bond angles of all 56 waters are altered
when
iridium is present. I haven't carefully studied the research work of
people
working with water but I strongly suspect that their water isn't
completely
pure and they are finding that the bond angles can be changed. There is
something else besides H2O in the water."
In other lectures Hudson makes a similar correlation
with
oxygen.
We are finding that the ORMUS elements are common in
water.
In fact, it looks like they determine some of the familiar properties
of
water as we know it. Ultra-pure water made from pure hydrogen burned in
pure oxygen does not behave anything like the water we know. The ORMUS
elements effect the viscosity, boiling point, freezing point and
surface
tension of water.
We believe that our ozone generator is producing
significant
amounts of O6 or diozone. It looks like this diozone can be used as a
"leash"
to capture and manipulate the ORMUS atoms. Here is a bit more
background
information on this concept.
The ORMUS elements differ in a fundamental way from
their
"ordinary" metallic counterparts. In a sense they can be considered to
be parallel to the metallic elements on the periodic table. What
differentiates
this form of matter from "ordinary" matter is that the ORMUS elements
are
in a high spin state. This means that the atoms are spinning more
rapidly
than ordinary atoms. This high spin pulls the electron cloud in toward
the nucleus of the atom, sort of like an ice skater pulling her arms in
to increase the rate of her spin.
As these electrons get closer to the nucleus they
pair
up into what is called "Cooper pairs" of electrons. (The Cooper pairing
phenomenon is named after one of the gentlemen who received a Nobel
prize
for its discovery.) These electrons, when they are Cooper paired, are
no
longer available for ordinary shared electron bonding between different
elements. This means that they can no longer form ordinary chemical
compounds.
Methods have been developed to convert metal to
ORMUS.
In one way or another these methods induce the high spin state and the
Cooper pairing of electrons in the individual atoms or diatoms. It is
also
possible to convert ORMUS to metal using different methods.
Each of the elements, that can be transformed this
way,
keep their individual elemental properties through the transition from
metal to ORME and to metal again. Some of these properties are common
to
both the metallic state and the ORMUS state. For example, the m-state
rhodium
gives water a sticky feel. This is also true of the metallic
form--rhodium
hydroxide. Also, rhodium seems to be useful as a catalyst in the ORMUS
state and in the metallic state.
Because these elements hold on to their electrons so
tightly
the ordinary spectrographic methods of identifying them simply don't
work.
The only way we currently know to identify them is to run a
spectrographic
analysis on a candidate ORMUS sample, then convert it metal and run the
spectrographic analysis again. If the first spectrographic analysis
shows
no metal and the second shows metal then we have identified an ORMUS
element.
Though these elements don't form chemical compounds
which
are bound by electron sharing, they do seem to be involved in chemical
compounds in some special ways. I believe that they should be suspected
to be present in any chemical compound which cannot be synthesized.
Chlorophyll
would be an example of this type of compound. I understand that the
"secret"
ingredient in chlorophyll is the ORMUS form of copper.
Since these elements are not bonded by shared
electrons,
how might they be bonded? I know of a couple types of bonds which might
apply. I will discuss one of these types of bonds, as it relates to
ozone.
All of these concepts are discussed in greater depth
in Hudson's lectures and in
Gary's article titled "Paranormal
Observations
of ORMEs Atomic Structure".
Superconductivity is a property of certain
substances
which are in a special quantum state called a Bose-Einstein Condensate
(BEC). A BEC is a large group of atoms which behave as a single atom
due
to their being in a common state. In the case of the ORMUS elements,
their
superconducting nature creates an energy field around each atom. This
energy
field is called a Meissner field. A Meissner field resonance couples
individual
ORME atoms to the point where many atoms can act like a single atom.
This
resonance coupling between ORME atoms allows you to perform a sort of
shadow
chemistry on them.
It appears that there are varying degrees of
ORMEishness.
An ORME diatom can have all of its electrons paired up or it can have
only
a portion of its electrons paired up. If you have an ORME diatom which
is partially paired this will leave some electrons available for
conventional
electron bonding with other elements. This ORME diatom will then have
one
foot in the ORMUS world and one foot in the metal world. You can use
these
partial ORMEs to manipulate the full ORMEs chemically.
Imagine that you want to collect all the loose male
dogs
in your town. It might be difficult to chase them all down individually
but there might be a simpler way to do this. You could find a female
dog
in heat and use a known property of male dogs to collect them. You
would
put the female dog on a leash and lead her through town and pretty soon
you will be leading all the loose male dogs around too. These male dogs
are not on your leash but they are attracted to the female dog and they
will follow you because you are leading her.
In a similar way we can do chemistry on the partial
ORME
and use the partial ORME to lead the full ORMEs around. To do this you
must coax the ORMUS atoms into a chemical box.
We believe that the simple methods to chemically
concentrate
the ORMUS elements from water that are described in the ORMUS document
at http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/ormus/ormus2.htm use this principle. The
sodium atoms provided with the lye appear to form a three atom cluster
or a triangle. We believe that this triangular molecule provides a nice
tight comfy inner space for the ORME to hide in. Similar ring molecules
made of carbon, oxygen and chlorine have also been used to trap and
chemically
manipulate the ORMUS elements. The oxygen ring molecule is the diozone
molecule.
Though you cannot get an electron handle on the
ORMUS
elements, if you get them in a diozone "box" you can use the electron
handles
provided by the diozone to put them where you want them. Once you get
them
where you want them you must remove the diozone ring in such a way as
to
leave the ORMUS atom intact and functional, but that is another story.
Here are some of Gary's comments on the value of O6
for
working with the ORMUS materials:
Speaking now, in stricter use of the concepts
'monatom' and
'diatom', I may also offer you some further comments which may be of
interest
to you. This is in regards to your question on Brown's gas, and also
relates to
your work using ozone, as an ORMEs charge pump.
Diatomic hydrogen is observed to be an ovoid, containing two
triangular "monatoms", each composed of 3 quarks (having 3 anu each).
The triangular H atoms are not identical in the types of their
constituent
quarks; each hydrogen in the diatom has the same mass, but differs from
the
other as a consequence of their quark components. When
dissociated into monatoms, the two
separated hydrogen atoms are stable (ie do not spontaneously dissociate
further) but I would suggest that they would prefer to be paired.
As monatoms, they loosely associate with free particles,
forming something like the atomic equivalent of the double-layer of
continuous-phase charge which forms around colloidal particles to
neutralize
their remaining charge; it is a less defined layering for a gaseous
continuos
phase than for a liquid as far as colloids are concerned, and this (gas
case)
is a close analog of what happens in the atomic state, where the
atomic-level
vacuum is the continuous phase, and the myriad of loose and
undifferentiated
subatomic particles are the matter that the layers are (dynamically)
formed
from around the monatoms, as a loose aggregate.
Diatomic oxygen is also an ovoid, containing
two spiral shapes, looking very much like helices of 5 turns each, with
each being "wound" in the opposite direction.
Diatomic Oxygen Unit
Like the hydrogen,
each monatom of the O2 diatom is dissimilar, being more positive or
negative,
respectively, from its mate.
Two Monatomic Oxygen Atoms
Oxygen is also stable as a monatom, but also
prefers to be paired. It too can use loose matter to neutralize its
monatomic
charge, but is entirely much less happy about the situation.
Three such oxygen monatoms may unite to form
ozone.
These will either be +-+, or -+-. The helices arrange with their
axes parallel, and triangularly spaced as an isosceles, when viewed end
on.
The Two
Different Ozone Varieties
Leadbeater noted that the positive variety of
ozone (+-+) tends
to rise, though no tendency to move either up or down is noted for the
negative variety. This is further confirmed in that for
observations
performed at high altitudes, nearly all the ozone found in the
atmosphere
is of the positive type. In any practical ozone generation system,
equal
amounts of each type will be formed. While I have not tried it,
it
appears that it should be possible to separate these according to
species,
once formed, by placing ozone gas in a potential gradient (- on the
upper
electrode surface) that draws the two types apart. Ozone that is
thus separated by species is substantially more stable and far less
explosive
in nature than ordinary heterogeneous ozone.
Oxygen is a very energetic and active element, and
is
capable of mediating several type of energies, some of which are not as
yet recognized by Science.
You have previously said:
>There is a large gap in our knowledge of
the
mechanism by
>which ozone moves the precious metals to
their
monoatomic
>state.
Jim's ozone technology generates a substantial
amount
of O6. I don't believe this particular allotrope is recognized yet, or
it just barely has been, and satisfying the karmic cost of that has
been
the cause of the delay in discussing it for you.
This is a conjugate molecule, which might be
termed di-ozone,
and consists of six oxygen helices, arranged at the corners a hexagonal
cell, alternating +-+-+-. It is reminiscent of the phalanx of
rocket
engines at the base of a Delta launch vehicle.
Di-Ozone
In oxides of the smaller members of the dumbbell
atomic
family, e.g. sodium, the oxygen spiral actually situates so it winds
round
or encircles the main central body of the dumbbell.
Sodium Hydroxide
From copper upwards
in the dumbbells, and also the bars group, it cannot do this (oxygen is
too small in diameter for them to fit), and so contents itself with a
side-by-side
arrangement, like a catamaran's outrigger. In the case of dumbbells,
the
oxygen and dumbbell axes always align in parallel. For a heavy
dumbbell
atom like gold, it is like a tiny woman, dancing with a huge fat man -
there just isn't any good way to hold on, and this is (in simple
terms),
how gold resists oxidation so well.
I previously stated
>Simple glancing thermal collisions knock
the
monatomic atom
>into a rapid spin, and that is how the
high spin
[super
>deformed] state leading to ORME transition
is
most commonly
>achieved.
Now, I may finally say some things about the
particular
ORMEs generating mechanism you are concerned with.
ORMEs formation by ozonation is a mechanism that
also
occurs in Nature. A small but significant amount of O6 is
produced
by each lightning strike, and also by highly energetic photons in the
upper
troposphere, stratosphere and ionosphere. However, because of
their
very high reactivity, the mean life of O6 molecules is usually quite
short,
and so this mechanism generates far fewer ORMEs in Nature than
geothermal
processes, yet it is still an important process.
When an O6 complex approaches a gold dumbbell,
something
quite interesting happens. Oxygen is a highly vigorous atom taken
singly, but the dipolar forces from six synchronized oxygens, working
as
a team, is something exceptionally powerful, and in a class by
itself.
The powerful forces of this molecule are what effects the transition of
gold, etc., into a superdeformed condition, and thence into the ORME
state.
In most cases, even when a single oxygen is paired
with
a dumbbell, the axial dipole of the oxygen has a marked effect on the
configuration
of the dumbbell. For example, a copper hydroxide molecule
[Cu(OH)2]
is flanked by 2 OH groups, each of which consists of an oxygen spiral
with
a hydrogen triangle (composed of 3 quarks) floating over each
end;
these two OH's stand on opposite sides of the copper main body.
2.gif)
Copper Hydroxide
The
effect of the forces from the ends of the oxygens in this configuration
is to repel and displace the funnels on each end of the copper, into a
shape like an oriental fan or peacock tail, standing straight out like
a Mohican haircut, on each end of the copper. This funnel displacement
takes place, even after the forces at the ends of the oxygens have been
mediated and toned down by the hydrogen groups.
The published illustration of Cu(OH)2 in Occult
Chemistry
doesn't do it justice. Leadbeater and Besant early on gave up
trying
to show things in 3-D, and settled for simple 2-D diagrams of the
elements.
The oxygens are not really in the plane of the fan as depicted, even
though
described that way in the text, written by Jinarajadasa, who was
describing
the illustration rather than the atomic structure. The plane
connecting
the two oxygen cylinder axes is actually perpendicular to the copper's
funnel-fan plane.
When gold meets an O6 complex, something of like
nature
occurs to its funnels. As they approach, the O6 and gold polarly
align, and the gold dumbbell slips into the center of the hexagonal O6
cell, which enlarges somewhat to accommodate the gold.
Gold Diatom
Being Surrounded by Di-Ozone
Like flowers
held in the blast of a jet engine exhaust, the funnels at each end of
the
gold then stand straight out, along the main axis of this complex,
under
the powerful combined action of the forces emanating from the ends of
the
synchronized oxygens.
The effect of this phenomena would be like what
happens when an ice skater swings her arms to go into a spin. At first
the spin is slow till she brings her arms up above her head, then the
spin becomes more rapid along her long axis.
Gary continues:
The 6 oxygens each contain counter-rotating
spirals.
These all come into phase lock when an O6 molecule forms, so that all
12
spirals are rotating in a synchronous fashion in the molecule, speaking
in regards to the rotational phase relationships of the main charge
carriers,
which are uniformly located, one per turn, on the helix of each
spiral.
This intra- molecular phase resonance is responsible for the great
power
of the O6 group, which thus exceeds the sum of its parts in its
oxidizing
potential. As can be seen, physical structure has a lot to do
with
atomic interaction and bonding potentialities.
With the funnels of an O6-embraced gold dumbbell
standing
straight out, it at this point has precisely the same super- deformed
physical
configuration as a dumbbell in high spin [around the short axis]. This
then, constitutes the basis
of the mechanism responsible for the formation of Cooper pairing, and
genesis
of the ORMEs state, that occurs from exposing specific elements to high
energy ozone. A very similar process occurs when bars family
elements
are exposed to O6. For compounds such as gold chloride, there are
additional complexities, but in general terms, basically the same type
of phenomena occurs.
The highly dipolar nature of this complex is what
lies
behind, and is responsible for, the magnetic properties of ozonated
ORMEs
(or ORMEs di-ozonides) and their salts. There are a number of
variations
to the structure I've just described. For example, the O6 group
acquires
hydrogen ions to form hydroxyl groups (similar to those of copper
hydroxide,
described earlier) when in water.
M-Gold Chloride Made Using Ozone
The propensity for the an ozone-gold complex to
deposit
gold on carbon, and its attraction to hydrocarbons such as grease and
gasoline,
is nothing more than an expression of the disposition of these
materials
to oxidize, and the affinity of the O6 in such an ORMEs complex for
them.
The appetite of the O6 is hardly satiated by the gold dumbbell, and it
is eager to find something else more reactive to bond to.
Even the tetroxides of platinum group elements
like Ru
and Os are relatively volatile, and the di-ozonides are even more
volatile.
When di-ozone is combined with salt complexes of these metals, the
resultant
compound is more stable, but is still anxious to be elsewhere, as soon
as it gets a chance. For instance, in aqueous solution, volatility
increases
due to dissociation.
Following laws of partial pressure and osmotic
diffusion,
volatized ORMEs (fully capable of tunneling), will ignore barriers to
other
molecules, and go to where the closest, most attractive reactants are,
following the path (as they see it) of least resistance: straight
through
into the gas tank, the crankcase, and the grease spots on the
floor.
The more combustive energy a substance has, the more the di-ozone
portion
will be attracted to it.
When the oxygens have reached their destination,
they
may or may not abandon the ORME they are attached to. There is a
wide range of events that could happen at this point. But as you
have seen, in some cases metal will be deposited, and some ORMEs will
also
remain, gelling the material. The absorption of "gold gas", or
di-ozone-ORMEs
complex into silica gel, which has a natural affinity for ozone, is
based
on the same principle; its affinity for di-ozone is greater still, in
proportion
to the increased O6 reactivity.
When kept in solution in a beaker as di-ozone
ORMEs complexes,
when they leave the liquid phase at the fluid interface, they do not go
straight up into the atmosphere above the liquid, but depart from the
liquid
along a vector which is dependent on their departure velocity vector,
and
this vector is random through a 180 degree umbrella. Because of
the
pseudo two dimensional interface between the container and the liquid,
this will naturally tend to be an area where significant migration
activity
occurs. Because of this, the number of ORMEs exiting along or
immediately
near the edges of the glass container will be greater than for any
other
part of the liquid surface. It is also obvious that particles
exiting
in this region will tend to strike the inner wall of the container,
just
at or above the liquid level, since a large number of their possible
departure
vectors will point them at that region, for that exit zone, around the
edge where the liquid/container interface or meniscus is.
Some percentage of the ORMEs hitting this region
of the
inner container wall will tunnel, rather than rebound. Should the
tunneling ORMEs deozonate, as a result of local conditions in the
amorphous
structure of the glass, then the resulting gold atom will become stuck
there, and its "appearance" will result in a localized stress riser, as
a dislocation in the glass structure. After enough of these
stress
dislocations have accumulated in the same region, the glass will
crack.
In this case it cracks in a nice clean ring.
Tunneling was occurring in other parts of Jim's
glass
beaker walls also, but this was taking place at random locations, so
the
points of added stress were spread out and more-or-less evenly
distributed.
Hence no cracking anywhere else. Glass containers should not be
used
to store ORMEs solutions for prolonged periods.
There is 6 inches of string to bridge two points 10
inches
apart. Either the string must be made longer, the points brought
closer, or some of both. The string is the karmic cost of the
knowledge,
and the span is the knowledge gap to be bridged. The prospects
look
good that this can be done.
I encourage you to continue to actively pursue a
course
that will remove those obstacles. Continue the active exchange
and
brokerage of information. Continue looking for a way to obtain
FEs
to support this purpose.
Anything you can do to augment the flow of
additional
knowledge into the equation from sources such as yourself, Jim, or your
other contacts and associates, will allow, and lead to, expanded scope
of discussions, and interpretive explanations to promote your
understanding.
Keep up your efforts, Barry. The karma of this thing is beginning
to melt like the wicked witch after Dorothy dowsed her.
Gary
In another post Gary wrote:
Dissolution in acids may occur with partial ORMEs;
a sample
may be *nothing but* partial ORMEs and still completely dissolve in
acid.
Whether partials will dissolve in acids depends on the particular
element
involved, the degree of partiality, and the energy flowing through the
paired valence circuits. You and Hudson presently lack means of
quantitatively
determining either of these last two parameters. You can use acid
to eliminate partial content from your samples. But there are
other
considerations. Acids may also react with the oxygens in
ORMEs-di-ozonides,
with deleterious consequences, as explained in a moment.
You must be careful to properly distinguish the
differences
between sample types. There are several very distinct materials, which
must be differentiated between if you wish to avoid problems.
Sample |
Approx. Color |
1 ORMEs |
[white] |
2 Partial ORMEs |
[from gray to white] |
3 Partial ORME
compounds (salts) |
[wide variations] |
4 ORME di-ozonides |
[*white] |
5 Partial ORME
di-ozonides |
[*varies typ.gray-white] |
6 Partial ORME
di-ozonide compounds |
[widevariations] |
* Presumed colors
Copper is an exception, its partial colorations
also reflecting
the natural copper-red, in lesser degrees of partiality (2 &
5).
The material Jim is collecting in his traps is 1, 2, and 3. The
other
materials, made by Jim from metals, or from ozonating trap material or
chemical compounds are 4, 5, and 6.
As you can see from the above table, the fact that
Hudson
remains unconvinced of the existence of partial ORMEs, as well as
lacking
familiarity with di-ozonides, is not particularly important from a
color
standpoint (criteria #1). But the presence of oxygen in the complex can
alter the expected results, depending on the chemical processes (etc.)
samples are subjected to. The reasons for this may perhaps help guide
Jim
toward fruitful directions of experimentation.
There are essentially two ways that an
ORME-di-ozonide
can lose its oxygens, to become a "normal" (ie de-ozonated) ORME.
The O6 can come off, just as it got on, by slipping off one end of the
dumbbell or bars element. It is like a girl slipping a continuous
circular bracelet off her wrist. But doing this exposes the
funnels
or bars on the exiture end of the ORME to powerful disrupting forces
from
the O6 molecule as it departs, and often causes Cooper pairs to be
broken
during the separation process. This is its favored way of coming
off in many chemical processes, in the absence of other factors.
The other means of losing the oxygens is for the
O6 complex
to open up, like a hinged bracelet, so they come off without passing
over
the end of the ORME within. The O6 breaks apart and comes off in
pieces, in either O3 or O2 molecules. This is much less likely to
disrupt any Cooper pairing that is present; the captive ORME will then
most likely still continue to be an ORME, after it is freed from the
oxygens
that were girdling it.
In many of the operations Jim has used to remove
the oxygens,
"pinning" the ORME, as you are terming it, the transformation into a
metallic
or partially metallic state (low order partial ORME) is actually the
result
of the oxygens blowing apart the Cooper pairing as they slide off,
going
after carbon for example, rather than chemical destabilization of the
ORME's
paired valencing. Once one end of a gold ORME's Cooper pairing is
ruptured in this way, energy transients inside the atom often blow
apart
those funnel pairings on the other end as well, as the remaining
valence
circuits attempt to (often impossibly) assume a greater amount, or in
some
cases to maintain the entirety, of the atom's Meisner flux by
themselves.
It appears that stages of Hudson's ORMEs analysis also causes this
result.
Jim has noted that ozonated ORMEs seem to
represent a
metastable state, and this is why. Some processes remove the
oxygen
in a way that breaks the Cooper pairing, ending in a metal.
Others
remove the oxygen, in a manner so as to typically leave the ORME
intact,
which then, of course, shows itself very inert and recalcitrant to any
further chemical manipulations, typical of ORMEs David Hudson has been
working with.
There are some other factors which are important,
and
may be of help. You have learned that, because the di-ozone complex is
highly dipolar, (as you have repeatedly observed first-hand with your
various
magnet experiments), it is susceptible to alignment and orientation by
an external field. By aligning the O6/ORMEs complex with a
polarizing
field perpendicular to an electric field, the oxygens may be broken off
and removed, laterally. I suggest approaching this by applying the
electric
field in an aqueous electrolytic cell, with a perpendicular magnetic
field.
Fully paired ORMEs do not react chemically, except
as
in the case of O6 and some other unusual constructs. You may
reasonably
conclude that the ORMEs involved in Hudson's chemistries are partials.
Anyone duplicating Hudson's procedures may wish to
do
metrics to quantify, or keep track of, chlorine-in and chlorine-out
(for
example), to see how much is actually being bound to the ORMEs you are
working with. This is an indirect means of monitoring the
partialities
present. Comparing the molar quantities of chlorine binding to
the
ORMEs, with the molar quantity of the gold present, will give you an
idea
of the number of partial valences engaging in binding reaction.
You
may release and measure the chlorine from ORMEs chloride, and deduce
from
that how many active partial ORME valences are present. That will
only involve the partials engaging in binding, and would not tell
anything
about the amount of non-reacting higher order partials or 100% ORMEs
which
may also be present. But measuring released reactants is
valuable,
if the ORMEs were made from metal in the first place, so the molar
amount
of gold, etc., present is known a priori. Things may then be
meaningfully
deduced as to the relative number of non-reactive valences.
Wrapping an O6 around an ORME charges it just
fine, in
just about the twinkling of an eye. I might go so far as to say
it
is the Ne Plus Ultra method for ORMEs formation; at least it is the key
first step in the process. It is getting the O6 off again without
trashing everything that I have been gradually and gently leading your
attentions towards.
Charging an ORMEs system is different than
charging ORME
atoms individually, but there are some similarities and carry over,
when
individually charged atoms are combined into contiguity.
__________________________________
On oxygen forms you wrote:
>The only thing that I can find that you
previously
wrote regarding
>the stability of O6 is:
>>However, because of their very high
reactivity,
the mean life
>>of O6 molecules is usually quite
short, and
so this mechanism
>>generates far fewer ORMEs in Nature
than geothermal
processes,
>>yet is still an important process.
>...Is O6 a more likely or more stable
structure
than O5 or O7?
>and Why might FE ozone be more persistent
than
ozone produced by
>other methods?
Barry, you found part of what I was referring to,
but
I also discussed the phase lock between the atoms at some length, which
might well have provided an indication to you that the molecule is
intrinsically
stable (I am distinguishing between stability, and reactivity, as two
separate
properties, the first relating to the tendency of a molecule to
decompose,
apart from reacting with other things).
You should also be aware that there is more than
one form
of O6. The O6 I have been discussing with you, with its unique ring
shape,
is the only one which has any usefulness relative to ORMEs. Others also
exist. Though these others are more common, they are far less
interesting
than the O6 ring. But the different forms all have the same mass and
charge,
though certainly not the same thermal stability or reactivity. So you
must
be discriminating in deciding which kind you have, by the way you
measure
them.
Because the O6 ring shares the same mass and
charge as
the transient O6 ozones, because of its relative rareness (except in
the
FE), because of its short average life, and because of its ability to
"blend
in" with its O3 cousins (which always accompany it in large numbers),
these
factors have conspired to prevent scientists from noticing it, and
hence
from doing any work to identify it, up until very recently.
Left to itself, (ring) O6 is very stable; ie, it
doesn't
show the same tendency to spontaneously decompose, as O3 eventually
does.
But it makes up for it by reacting with all sorts of things, and doing
so usually causes it to break up (most ORMEs-forming metals being
notable
exceptions, in which cases it remains intact).
O5, O7, etc., are variations of O3 chains (see
below),
involving some O2s tacked on, and are rather transient forms.
In water, O6 will react vigorously with most types
of
impurity materials present in the water, but not much with the water
itself.
You may reflect, that Jim's initial gold recovery attempt, starting him
on his present path of destiny, would have been an abject failure, if
O6
reacted with water to an appreciable degree.
Once the impurities have been oxidized, the
remaining
O6 may persist for quite a while, depending on how much remains at that
point, but will eventually diffuse out of the water into the
atmosphere,
where it soon finds something to oxidize. The rate of diffusion depends
on the temperature of the water. Also remember, a little O6 goes a long
way -quite a bit farther than O3- for a water taste-test.
___________________________________
>From a conversation with Jim you transcribed,
speculating
on the fundamental cause underlying the high activity
of
the FE's output gas:
>Barry- Ok, well what's the difference between
that ozone
>and other ozone?
>
>Jim- It is eager to react. It's unstable. It's
been
>pumped up to the point. . . It's a balloon that's
over
>inflated and it wants to pop.
>
>Barry- Ok, is it because you've got O4,O5 and O6
or
is
>it because . . .?
>
>Jim- No. That's a different issue. This is because
>it's just ozone. This is something we can measure
today
>and demonstrate today vs the other which is
difficult
at
>best.
>
>Barry- Ok, I understand how you get it energized,
but
>what's different about the molecule that's
energized?
>
>Jim- Ah, don't know.
Despite Jim's view that this is due to some
alteration
of O3, the high activity is due primarily to the presence of O6, and to
a much smaller degree to some other oxygen forms which, though less
active
than O6, are still a bit more active than O3. It is not because of a
change
in common O3's energy. Refer to an earlier email, for an explanation of
the reasons why O6 has eluded recognition.
The uses of the O6 ring are great and manifold. It
is
a very powerful oxidizer. Its potential uses range all the way from
creating
and super-activating ORMEs, to recovering gold from sea water, to
powering
giant booster rockets. It will supplant and replace ozone in many
existing
applications, due to its superior oxidizer properties. Many new things
will be discovered that were impossible before shall become known. It
will
save and prolong countless lives, help clean up the planet, avert great
suffering, and make the future a brighter vision.
So much from it... and such a tiny little thing it
is,
too, all bright, pure, and sparkling.
We believe that there are many useful interactions
between
oxygen and the ORMUS elements in the body. We suspect that hemoglobin
is
partially composed of ORMUS rhodium and that an increased availability
of ORMUS rhodium in the body will facilitate oxygen transport. I have
personally
noticed this in that when I am supplementing ORMUS rhodium in my diet,
I have significantly greater ability to exercise without becoming
winded.
Previously in this article I quoted Gary as
proposing that the oxygen vortex, when arrayed in a hexagram with their
axes all pointed in the same direction, would "blow" the valence funnel
arms of the gold diatom away from the short axis of the diatom. This
would promote the pairing of these valence funnel arms.
I imagine this would look like a fat ballet
dancer who starts spinning with arms out but encounters a blast of air
from below which blows his arms up above his head where he can easily
clasp his hands. The difference, in this case, is that the ballet
dancer would have twelve arms above his head and twelve arms below his
feet. In the Paranormal
Observations article Gary described this thus:
"Each element in
the dumbbell shaped group has a total of 24 valence funnels; there are
12 at each end of the atom, representing 6 sets of half valences. The
12 funnels are arranged a bit like blades of a ceiling fan, which
rotate on the major elliptical axis of the central body, hence the
dumbbell look. The ends of the valence funnels are slightly staggered,
alternating up and down slightly as you go around the atom."
An image of a dumbbell group atom can be
seen below:
The oxygen atoms in the O6 (or possibly O12)
hexagon array around the gold diatom would be in spin coherence as I
described in my 1999 article titled Patterns of
Motion.
This array of oxygen atoms might look
something like one or more of the arrays pictured below:
Oxygen 6
Oxygen 12
Di-Ozone
Apparently, anti-gravity like effects have
recently been measured emitting above and below the spin axis of
Bose-Einstein condensates in spin coherence. See:
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1999/10/taming_gravity/
This anti-gravity like force was discovered
by Dr. Ning Li who calls it "AC Gravity".
I suspect it may also be related to the
spin fields (scalar waves) that Alexandr Shpilman has associated with
the ORMUS elements.
All
Content Copyright 2007 AVRA unless otherwise specified
Recommend
this page
Comments @ Silvermedicine.org
- No website addresses or any other spam is tolerated in the comment section -
To leave an anonymous comment, please use this email address: anon @ silvermedicine . org
|
content
copyright 2007 AVRA
Website Design, Las Vegas
 back
to top 
Silver
Ozone Therapy & Generators
Primary
Physiological Effects/Benefits of Ozone Therapy ---- Ozone
Sauna Therapy - General Information & Safety ---- Ed
Mccabe: Oxygenation & Ozone Therapy | A History with References----Ozone
Generators & Equipment - UV, Cold Plasma, Corona, Ozone Tents,
Saunas ----Ozonated & Ozonating
Olive Oil ----Ozone,
Oxygen, and Sauna Therapy Email List/Group ----Low
Cost Ozone Generator Kit: UV or Cold Spark for Ozone Steam Saunas ----Ultrasonic
Ozone Spa Baths - Hydrotherapy & Balneotherapy----Activated
Oxygen & Ozone----Ozone
is Good? Ozone is Bad?----The
Story of Ozone----Ozone and ORMUS/ORMES
|
